As the OUR TEAM election ramped up very summer, the CoinDesk periodical team began to wonder: Prescribed the mistrust in relies and financial firms, would most likely bitcoin and blockchain develop to be an election issue?
The answer, it turned out, must have been a resounding no, as but not major party candidate assessed in substantively on the condition.
CoinDesk had much of the past year . 5 attempting to engage with the advertisments of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump to no avail. Messages or calls to their respective headquarters using Brooklyn and Manhattan came unanswered.
Our company saw Clinton’s campaign make lip service to the tech in a marked policy statement, only to read and learn about months later that him / her senior campaign officials noticed the digital currency as “too Libertarian” to accept. In one case, speaker Hope Hicks declined idea by email – certain amount of responsiveness the Clinton campaign would fail to receive.
We plan we might get lucky. At the end, to quote Donald Overcome, we were wrong . Nor did the marketing of early hopefuls shares Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders engage with us one (though there was a promising begin in the latter case).
Ultimately, none of the major prospects would go on the record via any publication about the technician or the sweeping changes that it promises to bring to market sectors and consumers.
Yet, this isn’ g to say the election didn’ t have its occasions.
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul spoke openly about bitcoin, as did Libertarian leadership candidate Gary Johnson, both these styles whom accepted donations in the digital currency. (We also asked the email campaign for Green Party option Jill Stein what they conceived, but our calls was placed unreturned).
Are you still, in the midst of it all, we received Congress push for broad action at the tech (in as feasible for nonbinding a way as possible). One proposal even desired to potentially rethink the way you manage health care for vets using blockchain.
We often saw the start of a process at the summit US elections watchdog which can perhaps reclassify what a bitcoin donation is strictly. Along the way, some would predict that particular champions might push bitcoin within this way or that.
So , there was shifting, albeit in a piecemeal means.
One could probably argue that the stage was in fact set for 2020 as the presidential election year where bitcoin and blockchain turn into a campaign issue or even sees asked about in a presidential disputa (our attempts to get a bitcoin question into the Democratic Time and GOP debates for New Hampshire were unsuccessful).
With Congressional action on the tech supposed to happen over the next six years, there might soon you ought to be change. Here’ s with the expectation.
Warning: The feedback expressed in this article are those you get with the author and do not necessarily present the views of, and really should not be attributed to, CoinDesk.